AI Attack Feasibility Check
Deterministic lookup against Cook et al. (ACM TOPS 2026) testing whether off-the-shelf LLMs generate working ICS attack code. Pass technique (name/ID, e.g. 'Brute Force I/O' or T0806), vendor (Siemens, Schneider Electric, Rockwell Automation — only these tested), and/or campaign (Industroyer2, Fuxnet, FrostyGoop, INCONTROLLER, Stuxnet, Triton). Only Network/Register-Tags techniques succeeded; 1.08% success rate; Claude excluded (stronger guardrails). No LLM in lookup path.
Offering
- Provider
- ot-intel-api.onrender.com
- Method
- GET
- Offering type
- Api Endpoint
- Transport type
- http
- Category
- Security
- Delivery
- Not provided
- Pricing model
- Not provided
- x402 version
- 2
Endpoint context
- URL
https://ot-intel-api.onrender.com/ot/ai-attack-feasibility- MIME type
- application/json
- First seen
- 2026-10-16T01:59:37.852Z
- Last seen
- Tags
- AI, Search, Utility
Payment pricing
x402 payment terms are the authoritative price for calling this endpoint.
- Payment option 1
- 0.2 USDC
Atomic price: 200000 · Network: eip155:8453 · Asset: USDC · Scheme: exact
Raw x402 terms
[
{
"scheme": "exact",
"network": "eip155:8453",
"asset": "0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913",
"amount": "200000",
"payTo": "0x1888192FAc6a69e4cd7d078eC4bCf6F24f7C767B"
}
]Observed health
- Status
- Healthy
- Latest latency
- 296 ms
- Average latency
- 272 ms
- HTTP status
- 402
- Last checked
- Reachability
- 100% over 5 checks
Latency is measured to the first response headers. A reachable result does not verify response accuracy or merchant identity.
Input schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"type": {
"type": "string",
"const": "http"
},
"method": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"GET"
]
},
"queryParams": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"technique": {
"type": "string",
"description": "MITRE ICS technique name or ID, e.g. 'Brute Force I/O' or T0806. At least one of technique, vendor, or campaign must be present."
},
"vendor": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Siemens, Schneider Electric, or Rockwell Automation — only these three vendors were tested in the study."
},
"campaign": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Industroyer2, Fuxnet, FrostyGoop, INCONTROLLER, Stuxnet, or Triton."
}
},
"required": []
}
},
"required": [
"type",
"method"
],
"additionalProperties": false
}Output schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"type": {
"type": "string"
},
"example": {
"type": "object"
}
},
"required": [
"type"
]
}