Solana Token Safety Check
Solana SPL token safety, rug check and honeypot / scam detection before trading: is this Solana token a rug pull, honeypot or scam? Verdict SAFE/RISKY/CRITICAL + 0-100 score combining STATIC checks (mint/freeze authority, holder concentration) AND BEHAVIORAL analysis (liquidity, churn, recent dump, tx velocity) plus a blue-chip false-positive guard so USDC/USDT/SOL are never flagged. Pre-trade SPL token security / scam-token detection catching behavioral rugs static checkers miss.
Offering
- Provider
- x402-endpoints.onrender.com
- Method
- GET
- Offering type
- Api Endpoint
- Transport type
- http
- Category
- Blockchain And Crypto
- Delivery
- Not provided
- Pricing model
- Not provided
- x402 version
- 2
Endpoint context
- URL
https://x402-endpoints.onrender.com/solana/token-safety- MIME type
- application/json
- First seen
- 2026-10-16T01:59:37.852Z
- Last seen
- Tags
- solana-token-safety, rug-check, honeypot, behavioral-analysis, spl-token-risk
Payment pricing
x402 payment terms are the authoritative price for calling this endpoint.
- Payment option 1
- 0.01 USDC
Atomic price: 10000 · Network: eip155:8453 · Asset: USDC · Scheme: exact
Raw x402 terms
[
{
"scheme": "exact",
"network": "eip155:8453",
"asset": "0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913",
"amount": "10000",
"payTo": "0x1D1B81247C407521E2A01F3E21514870dcf1620f"
}
]Observed health
- Status
- Healthy
- Latest latency
- 298 ms
- Average latency
- 243 ms
- HTTP status
- 402
- Last checked
- Reachability
- 100% over 7 checks
Latency is measured to the first response headers. A reachable result does not verify response accuracy or merchant identity.
Input schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"type": {
"type": "string",
"const": "http"
},
"method": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"GET",
"HEAD",
"DELETE"
]
},
"queryParams": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"mint": {
"type": "string",
"description": "SPL token mint address (base58), e.g. 'EPjFW...Dt1v' (USDC)"
},
"deep": {
"type": "boolean",
"description": "Deeper behavioral + holder analysis (more RPC calls)"
}
},
"required": [
"mint"
]
}
},
"required": [
"type",
"method"
],
"additionalProperties": false
}Output schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"type": {
"type": "string"
},
"example": {
"type": "object"
}
},
"required": [
"type"
]
}